AKM_47 : Howdy Modi : Proud and contrast

Housten, City in Texas state of USA  seen a huge program organised by indian american people.This event got much popularity because of the presence of US president Trump with Modi.

Presence of more than 50000 people shows the magnifacance of popularity of Modi, it was a highest number of people gathering in USA for any external political leader.

It is definitely a matter of pride that PM of our country is so much popular, more than that the matter of pride is that the indians in USA are so much power full that President Trump hasn't lost the opportunity to attend it.

Modi has introduced Trump with lot of praise. Did it really required ?

But one thing Modi said was correct that Trump is very good in deal making.

In the next couple of days it got proved too, when trump offers himself twice for arbitration in Kashmir issue besides of clear no from India. 

It is not tough to understand that Trump has no sympathy with Pakistan,  it is just that he wants support of Pak army in Afganistan to fight against Taliban. That's why offers mock support to Pak for Kashmir issue arbitration if both India and Pakistan are ready for same. Pakistan is ready, that means Trump wants to be mediator if India is ready, clearly knowing the fact India does not wants any third country. Therefore it's only false sympathy of Trump for Pakistan.

This is big victory of Indian diplomacy that Pak has no support from world community on Kashmir issue. 

In USA around 45 lacs Indo-american peoples are living, And they are really power full in every sector of USA. Next year their is election in USA and trump tried to grab it as an opportunity to showcase himself as positive thinker towards Indo-american population. Speech of him was nothing less than election campaign, tried to speak the checklist of everything what he has done in last 3 years and wants to done in future.

Modi has utilized opportunity and defend the abolishment of article 370.

Clearly mentioned that it was not only ruling party decision, but supported by more than two third majority in the parliament, specifically in upper house of parliament where BJP does not has the majority numbers.

There are some issues which were less talked and Modi government has really need to learn from USA in the time when Indian economy is towards heavy slowdown. Unemployment, right now in Modi government country facing highest rate of unemployment in last 45 years in contrast with Trump's USA, where unemployment is at the least rate of last 50 years.

 In the world politics the support of one country towards another is strategic and  and does not depends upon morality. Therefore beside of being morally correct country has to be much more powerful economically. Definately National security is big issue, but govt also required to be focussed on the issue of economy and need to take right steps for fighting against this  slowdown.

#Shared_dreams_bright_futures

AKM_46 : Abolishing of 370 | State to two UTs

There are different speculation of this big decision of Abolishing the 370 from Jammu Kashmir and also turning it to two unioun territories.

1. J&K and  370 : History
2. Role of Big mandate helped in bigger decision
3. Lack of unity and thoughtfulness in opposition.
4. Probable pros and cons after the decision
5. Immediate steps required to be taken

It is very well known now, at the time of independence when most of the princely states in defined territory of india have joined the country. At that time J&K being Muslim majority state with a Hindu King  decided to remain autonomous. But Pakistan has illegally started capturing most of the part of State. In hurry the king Hari singh asked India for help and joined the Indian dominion with the contract called Instrument of Accession with some "specific conditions". Later on Indian Army helped J&K to get the state out of pak capture but due to interviene by United nations, millatery of both countries stopped wherever they are which is now known as line of cease (LOC). Later on these "specific conditions"  which were proposed during IOA with some additional laws drafted in constitution as article 370 in the part of temporary laws.

Modi Govt since their first term known for surprising/riskful decisions. Such huge mandate provide the govt confidence for something which is their goal to achieve since the foundation of BJP. This decision is bigger because everyone was expecting that at max govt going to abolish the 35A. But since Modi is expected for doing unexpected so the central govt proposed Abolishing everything from 370, which makes J&K different from any other state of country. They didn't stop here only, they also proposed for dividing the Laddakh separate and assigned both divided entity as Unioun territories. Also pass the both bills from Rajya Sabha as well as Loksabha with a big majority numbers at both places.

In all the discussion on this in both the houses of Parliament, Opposition specially congress didn't seem to have a unique party line, morever they were not able to objectify  the points they put while opposing it. Number of the leaders of Congress party supports decision of govt. Opposition had to identify the actual issue that they wanted to oppose i.e opposing for 370 or opposing for dividing the state or opposing for the converting state to Unioun territory or opposing for the method implemented while making this decision. Even the son of King Hari Singh and vateron leader of Congress Dr. Karan Singh  in his open letter didn't oppose this decision. He wrote that when he was himself sader-ae-riyast of J&K had proposed to abolish 35A. however he put the question on the method of implementation of it, but didn't doubted the dicision.

Pros : Because of 370, J&K was really separated from mainstream of country. how unfortunate is this that migrants which came from Pakistan to J&K at the time of partition didn't have voting rights in the state from past 70 years. More than 100 laws including RTI, RTE, reservation etc which were come into existence after independence didn't got applied to state because of the provisions in this article.
Only few political families took advantage of it since last 60-70 years. 
Now Incoming of external investment into the state will also help the Kashmiri youth for their employment.
Dividing the state is also positive decision for
Laddakh people  and no harm for J&K. This was awaited demand for ladakh people.

Cons : Looking toward the decision their is no disadvantage for the residents of State as well the country. But since people of valley are brainwashed for last 70 years regarding the article 370 and against indian govt by Pak funded  separatist. Therefore it is little tough for the people of valley to accept it.

More than Army some mediaters are required in valley this time, who can make understand the population of Kashmir that "this decision is actually for their benefit in long term, now they are part of mainstream of country".
In the absence of such mediater dialogue ,  mischief maker (infact major politicians of kashmir as well) can took advantage to provoke the common population against this decision.

AKM_45

PART 2/2

" If you win, you should be polite and if you loose you should do introspection "

Shall Narendra Modi and ruling party BJP able to keep politeness or not ?
And will the Congress party do it's introspection or not ?
However the speech and posture of NaMo in central Parliament hall after elected as leader of NDA MPs was positive and polite.
With the huge victory of BJP in the elections, Indian Democracy has scarcity of opposition.
Major question is Why the opposition and specially Indian National Congress failed to revive in these elections ?
Answers could be
1.lack of strong face in front of Modi from Congress or opposition
2. Opposition has lack of strong and correct issues to get branding against ruling part,
3.lack of Alliances with AAP in Delhi/Haryana or in UP with SP and BSP.

Clearly third answer wouldn't have any impact if we see the winning margins of BJP candidates.

First point is most important there was no one against Modi, election was Modi vs no Modi.

second point is a clear fact that Congress party for last five years was not able to project the actual issues of country and never able to keep ruling party on backfoot. Congress has a very good manifesto still not able to brand it. In manifesto Congress promissed about NYAY scheme of paying 6000 every month to the 20% families of country. But rare of these eligible families actually got aware of it, consider if many of them get to know about it then also, lack of trust doesn't convert these aware people into votes for Congress.

Strong Opposition is required as much as strong government for stronger democracy. And strong media in addition of it makes the democracy strongest.

PART 1/2 READ HERE

A massive victory by Narendra Modi lead BJP in the 2019 General elections.
People during election used to say there is under current of NaMo but not a wave like 2014. As trends started to come, proved this under current, actually a electoral tsunami.
Clearly Modi wave of 2014 is still on and also seems more powerful.
2019 general elections, elections for 17th Loksabha done for 542 seats (out of total 545 seats). Out of these 542, BJP come up with 303, which is great majority on its own, and BJP lead NDA (National Democratic Alliance) won 351.
It's necessary to note that these 2019 LS elections has the highest voting percentage 67% in Democratic India since first elections in 1952. This is remarkable for Democracy.
More the the participation of people, stronger be our democracy. As Democracy is nothing but government of the people, by the people and for the people.

AKM_44

READ HERE

Gautam gambhir, Sunny Deol, Urmila matondkar, vijender singh, Hansraj Hans etc are the few names which has been added up in the already fat list of Parachute candidates for Parliament elections.
Political parties generally distribute tickets to celebrity candidates to take advantage of his/her fan following base as voter.
The celebrity also used to be interested and take this opportunity for enhance their so called reputation/fame or fullfilling their ambition.
Obviously it's really rare that any one of these parachute candidate really want to serve and interested in the people of their respective constituency.
The attendance of past celebrity MPs in Loksabha is enough to prove the above statement.
However It's a mutual beneficial deal b/w a political party and a celebrity.
BUT it's not at all good for democracy.
Not good for common people , and definitely not good for political party workers, who has been working for years, day and night, in the hope that one day they will get chance to represent their party in parliament.

It is actually the moral duty of parliamentarian that he/she should stand with the people in case of any requirement in their constituency on the contrary these celebrity Loksabha members keep continuing their professional work on full time basis and rarely visit to their constituency regions.

Solutions:
First, these Parachute candidates should have learn from few exceptional celebrity Loksabha members like Sunil Dutt etc and should leave their Full time professional work, and involve them selves actually with the public.

Second, the political party leadership's have to understand that by launching the parachute candidates in bulk they are actually demotivating their workers.

Third and most important, common people has to understand while voting, you should not vote some one just because you like his or her acting/sports instead of his/her actual work towards society/common people.
If we will not be aware about it, then in this mutual beneficial scheme of political parties and celebrities one day most of the Loksabha members may be the celebrities and unfortunately that day parliament will not be representing the whole country i.e "LOK" Sabha rather be representing the Bollywood or cricket Sabha.

Their is fine saying also that " Be fan/follower of anyone but never of a politician".

#Parachute_candidates

AKM_43

READ HERE

Interview after interview, political interview non-political interview, Scripted interview non-scripted interview.
PM Narendra Modi is not sparing any chance to disappear from Telivision/head lines/Prime time.
In last five years leaving last few months, he has done only single way communication through public meetings or Mann Ki Baat (except 3-4 interviews to his suitable journalists).
Now in the election campaign of 2019, He was also looking for same style public meetings but soon he may realise that this the same thing he was doing from last five years(continued in election mode) and thought to tweak the way of his political communication by giving lot of interviews (obviously to his suitable journalists till now) along with public meetings.

Certainly Narendra modi is the master player as far as political communication is concerned Moreover politics is concerned.
But the concern is the pseudo double side communication and fake journalism.
Since there is no cross questioning to the Mr. Prime minister. It seems like one sided communication only, just difference is 10-20 % of PM's speech is spoken by interviewer.
If some one interviewing with out research and cross questioning on the facts the interviewee then he is simply the actor like Akshay kumar but not the Journalist.
For example: almost in every interview PM got question about employment creation, He answered very well and said that if employments are not created then why more than a crore EPF account opened up. Interviewer change the question after this.

Let me ask the cross question does EPF account creation is the proof of permanent employment creation ?
Actually not, if I keep a temporary employee for 6-7 months then also he could have EPF account
Factually the number of EPF account created can never implies the same number of permanent employment created.
Why the interviewer in front of prime minister not able to ask this...either he has not researched over the fact or he is actually not a journalist but a actor.

Lot of companies service/manufacturing are recruiting temporary work forces for 6-7 months after that they have to leave their jobs, I don't think this is a employment opportunity.

If whole media started to be controlled by government then this system will be anarchy not democracy !!

#journalism

AKM_42

READ HERE

Today the biggest challenge which is questioning our development is:
WHAT WE REALLY NEED, ARE WE REALLY ASKING FOR SAME ???

Ans is a clear NO.
There are number of things that country needs before anything else but the bulk of country is asking for something which we really do not need at all, and these things are not taking us anywhere.

This election is not BJP vs Congress or Mahagathbandhan.

This election infact any election should be for fake issues/fake demands vs actual needs.

This election should be RAM MANDIR vs better GOVT HOSPITALS and GOVT SCHOOLS.

This election should be LOVE JEHAD vs POLLUTION.

This election should be fake INTOLERANCE vs MALNUTRITION.

This election should be HINDU - MUSALMAN vs UNEMPLOYMENT.

This election should be GAU RAKSHAK/MOB LYNCHING fake issue vs better INFRASTRUCTURE.

Do you really want to see developed india, do you really want to change country...you know what, you just have to understand the what you really need instead of what major media/ politicians are highlighting.

So, before stepping up to the election booth this time, Are we really ready with right demands ???

AKM_41

READ HERE

In couple of weeks Country will face elections for 17 th Loksabha. General elections are the biggest event of democracy and make reliesed the power that common men/women have, to decide who will going to be rule/serve them for next five years.
This festival of democracy in the country which has been started since 1952 has become really changed from then to now.
Changed from ballet papers to EVMs with VVPAT , changed from Congress as the biggest party to BJP the one, changed from Neharu as the biggest leader to Modi the one, Changed from one of the least expensive elections to the one of the most expensive elections of the world.

But unfortunately the thing that would most likely required to change pan India has not changed yet.
Still most of us instead of voting for the development/evaluation of previous work of any party, we used to vote for cast/religion/tradition/issues which really does not matter/pleasing promises with no long term vision.
This wasn't the "actual idea of democracy". Unfortunately we are turning to an older democracy election by election but not to matured/wiser democracy.

The actual parameter to vote for any candidate in every constituency , should not be the evaluation of its earlier work towards development/economy instead of his/her caste/religion or other pseudo issues?
All of us really need to think over it, before step up to election booth for pushing the EVM button.

#elections #idea_of_democracy